While we wish we could be together in person to celebrate the fifth PIDapalooza, there’s an upside to moving it online: now everyone can participate in the universe’s best PID party! With 24 hours of non-stop PID programming, you’ll be able to come to the party no matter where you happen to be.
Send us your ideas for #PIDapalooza21 Now is your chance to share your work in the #PIDapalooza21 spotlight!
This blog was initially posted on the European Association of Science Editors (EASE) blog: “EASE Council Post: Rachael Lammey on the Research Nexus”. EASE President Duncan Nicholas accurately introduces it as a whole lot of information and insights about metadata and communication standards into one post…
I was given a wide brief to decide on the topic of my EASE blog, so I thought I’d write one that tries to encompass everything - I’ll explain what I mean by that.
This year, Crossref’s Nominating Committee assumed the task of developing a slate of candidates to fill six open board seats. We are grateful that in the midst of a challenging year, we received over 70 expressions of interest from all around the world, a 40% increase from last year’s response. It was an extraordinary pool of applicants and a testament to the strength of our membership community.
There are six seats open for election (two large, four small), and the Nominating Committee is pleased to present the following slate.
The Initiative for Open Abstracts (I4OA) launched this week. The initiative calls on scholarly publishers to make the abstracts of their publications openly available. More specifically, publishers that work with Crossref to register DOIs for their publications are requested to include abstracts in the metadata they deposit in Crossref. These abstracts will then be made openly available by Crossref. 39 publishers have already agreed to join I4OA and to open their abstracts.
Cited-by shows how work has been received by the wider community; displaying the number of times it has been cited, and linking to the citing content.
Researchers cite other people’s work to acknowledge the material they used when writing their own paper. It’s useful to see which articles go on to cite the paper you’re reading, and how it may have built on or challenged its ideas.
Cited-by allows Crossref members to find out who is citing their content. Members can then display the counts and link to the citing content on their own work. Cited-by counts are publicly available, but only the member can see the details of which sources are citing their works.
Members who use this service are helping readers to:
easily navigate to related research,
see how the work has been received by the wider community, and
explore how ideas evolve over time by highlighting connections between works.
Watch the introductory Cited-by animation in your language:
Crossref members tell Crossref what content their papers are referencing by including that information as metadata when they register content. Users of the Cited-by service can then query that metadata to see which sources are citing their content.
To participate in Cited-by, you need to be a member, and you need to include references in your own metadata. Once you’re enabled for Cited-by, you you’ll able to query publications that cite your content. This allows for the display of citation counts and lists on articles so readers can see that the content they’re reading is being cited, as in this Australian Journal of Linguistics example:
Cited-by counts complement rather than replace other services, and may differ from those of other citation databases, such as Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science, which use a variety of sources for their citation data. Crossref Cited-by counts are based on the citation counts of other Crossref members participating in Cited-by.
Obligations and fees for Cited-by
Participation in Cited-by is optional
There is no charge for Cited-by
You must include references when you register content, in order to be eligible for Cited-by
You only retrieve Cited-by metadata for your own content
Our public APIs include Cited-by counts but not the actual works.
We match the metadata in the references to DOIs to establish a Cited-by relationship in the database. As new content is registered, we automatically update the relationships and notify you of new links.
Participation in Cited-by is optional, but encouraged
Because citations can happen at any time, Cited-by links must be kept up-to-date. Members should either check regularly for new citations or (if performing XML queries) set the alert attribute to true. This means the search will be saved in the system and you’ll get an alert when there is a new match
Once retrieved, Cited-by counts should be included and linked on your website.